← Idea board

Ops & productivity

Keyholder

A screen-time lock where a trusted person holds the unlock, so phone and computer limits are harder to bypass.

In plain English

What category is this?
Owners and teams buy to run day-to-day work — scheduling, projects, HR, ops. Here the focus is consumer productivity.
The idea, briefly

Hypothesis: the person you trust holds the key — profiles for study, work and free time allow only the apps you need, across phone and computer, with the keyholder approving any break, no hardware, no ads. This is a social/friction gate, not technically tamper-proof (see sources 10 and 15).

More ▾
What buyers expect

People comparing tools like Opal, Freedom, one sec expect the basics to work without surprise fees or missing pieces. The loud complaints are: HN commenter nkcmr: ScreenTime 'allows bypass with one click' and 'makes it almost non-effective', so the one-tap escape defeats the intent; and hN commenter iLoveOncall: 'I haven't seen any of those apps (or built-in OS features like screen time on iOS) not become useless in a matter of days.'.

More ▾
Sources
15
Checked
15
Competitors
5
Gaps
5
Source depth
Page checked
15 · 100%
Snippet only
0 · 0%
Claim confidence
Documented
12 · 86%
Interpreted
2 · 14%
Sources by type
  • complaint7
  • pricing5
  • market2
  • playbook1

Competitors

5
Starting monthly price

Parsed from public pricing blurbs (entry paid tier when available). Max in set: $8.29/mo.

Competitor comparison
CompetitorFromFree tierSource
Opal$8.29/moYesopal.so✓
Freedom$3.33/moYesfreedom.to✓
one secFreeYesone-sec.app✓
BrickSee notes—getbrick.com✓
PIM (Please Inconvenience Me)FreeYesnews.ycombinator.com✓

What customers complain about

5
What customers complain about
GapSrc
HN commenter nkcmr: ScreenTime 'allows bypass with one click' and 'makes it almost non-effective', so the one-tap escape defeats the intent.
HN commenter iLoveOncall: 'I haven't seen any of those apps (or built-in OS features like screen time on iOS) not become useless in a matter of days.'.
HN commenter Cider9986 in 2026 says 'none of these apps can really make your distracting phone into a smart dumb phone because of Apple's limitations', finds 'one sec.
A DIY workaround is already widespread: HN commenter garyfirestorm says 'Ask your spouse or a friend you trust to set screen time passcode.
Explicit willingness to pay (a 2020 comment, older than the other gaps): HN commenter graeme wrote he 'would pay good money for a solid iOS screen time app that.

Documented Interpreted

How competitors find customers

2
How competitors got customers
TacticSrc
Lead with third-party proof, then let influencers and press carry it. one sec ran studies with Max Planck Institute and Heidelberg University (published in PNAS),one-sec.app✓
Make the prop the pitch. Brick's page leads with WSJ, NYT, WaPo and Vogue coverage built on a single object and stacks 55,000+ five-star reviews as proof.getbrick.com✓

Your angle & pricing wedge

Angle and pricing wedge
PieceClaimSrc
AngleHypothesis: the person you trust holds the key — profiles for study, work and free time allow only the apps you need, across phone and computer,news.ycombinator.com✓
WedgePlan: undercut on price with a software-only keyholder sold one-time below Brick's roughly $60 device and below Opal's $99.99/yr or $399 lifetime.news.ycombinator.com✓

How others got traction

3
What worked for others
MoveWhySrc
Brick sells a roughly $60 one-time physical device and reports 55,000+ five-star reviews,Company-attributed on Brick's site: limits are beaten because the key is always in reach, so Brick 'creates physical separation'.getbrick.com✓
One sec reports a peer-reviewed evidence base (its homepage lists the Max Planck/Heidelberg PNAS 20…Company-attributed: 'Essentials are free. It is not our goal to get rich over your phone addiction.' The PNAS page itself returned HTTP 403…one-sec.app✓
PIM charges a one-time $14.99 with no subscription and still landed local press coverage.Founder-attributed on the Show HN post: 'everything was all about getting you to subscribe - but I avoid subscriptions like the plague.news.ycombinator.com✓

Market heat

  • Brick's own site shows 55,000+ five-star reviews and claims 95%+ of a 3,500+ user survey feel less distracted , showing demand for a hard lock.

  • One sec shows 100K+ five-star reviews and claims the app saves 3000+ years of scrolling every week (both company-reported, unaudited).

  • Show HN: Foqos, a free open-source NFC-tag blocker, drew 225 points and 109 comments in Jan 2025, showing demand for a physical-friction blocker independent of any paid product.

    More ▾

Revenue signals

7
Revenue signals
SignalSrc
One sec reports 100K+ five-star reviews, '3000 years saved from scrolling every week' and 230,349 years saved; these are self-reported and unaudited.
one-sec.app✓
Brick reports 55,000+ five-star reviews and, from a survey of 3,500+ users, '95%+ feel less distracted'; self-reported marketing numbers.
getbrick.com✓
Opal prices a $399 one-time lifetime plan alongside $99.99/yr.
opal.so✓
Freedom prices a $99.50 one-time 'Forever' plan and $8.99/mo monthly.
freedom.to✓
One sec prices a 99.99 EUR lifetime plan and 14.99 EUR/yr.
one-sec.app✓
Brick sells a roughly $60 one-time device with no subscription.
getbrick.com✓
PIM sells a one-time $14.99 app with no subscription (founder comment on the Show HN post, source 13), establishing a low software-only entry point;
news.ycombinator.com✓

Should you build this?

You'd pay for this if you have already installed a blocker, still tapped 'Ignore Limit', and resorted to asking someone else to hold your passcode. The proposed product is a keyholder gate: your phone and laptop show only the apps a profile allows until the person you trust approves a break. It is a crowded, easily copied category and free tools exist; the only candidate edge is the second-person workflow plus a low one-time price, and the cited evidence (sources 10 and 15) shows software-only enforcement is friction, not a tamper-proof lock.

More ▾

All sources

15
All sources
SourceKindStatusAccessed
pricingpage checked2026-10-04
pricingpage checked2026-10-04
pricingpage checked2026-10-04
playbookpage checked2026-10-04
Brick product page

getbrick.com

pricingpage checked2026-10-04
marketpage checked2026-10-04
pricingpage checked2026-10-04
complaintpage checked2026-10-04
complaintpage checked2026-10-04
complaintpage checked2026-10-04
complaintpage checked2026-10-04
complaintpage checked2026-10-04
complaintpage checked2026-10-04
marketpage checked2026-10-04
complaintpage checked2026-10-04